Rozalind
Drummond
peeping tom: detail, 1996
|
The
irresolvable paradox surrounding the representation and
definition of the woman is meticulously explored in
Rozalind Drummonds multi-media installation peeping
tom. Drummonds exhibition uses a (sometimes
unstable) mixture of video technology, popular culture
and Freudian referents to confront and question the
patriarchally constructed enigma of the feminine. The
result is a lucid examination of the voyeuristic male
gaze. Favouring a Lacanian theoretical stance, peeping
tom posits the female as a logocentric mystery
requiring a textual analysis. Numerous references are
made to the notions of a communicating subject and the
construction of the feminine through language: Freudian
titles compete with detective novels on wall-mounted
bookshelves, library catalogues list forensic studies and
pulp thrillers, three display cabinets house a diverse
collection of old sepia photographs, letters, ribbons,
and a plethora of found objects, all suggesting a
virtual life lived by a person or persons
unknown. The installation is rhetorically structured like
a museum display; a painstaking reconstruction of a dead
past. The display cases are complemented by
Drummonds film-noir style shots of the Freud Museum
in London. Much of the imagery is calculatingly dark and
sombre, alluding to the crime section of Madam
Tousards.
Drummond has created an artificial,
cryptically narrated, masculinist subjectivity. Like a
psychoanalyst reading a patient or a
detective investigating a mystery, the viewer deciphers
the story through clues provided at random.
The story reveals an arguably pathological perception
of the feminine. Drummonds women are shallow,
monochrome beauties, naively modeling for long-forgotten
amateurs. Manipulated and enlarged, they become images of
a reconstituted femininity; a postmodern perception of a
post-war sexuality. The women in these tinted
snapshots pout and pose for the observer,
self-consciously dropping a shoulder-strap or revealing a
glaringly white length of thigh. The form imitates early
fifties glamour, but the content recalls eighties
feminist discourse. The female body is represented as an
object of visual penetration, vulnerably exposed for the
masculine gaze.
Further commentary on the tension between masculine
subject and feminine object is provided by three small
video screens mounted at eye level at the far end of the
installation. One screen follows the path of a woman
through a subtly-lit museum. Observing an endless variety
of preserved objects, she becomes herself an object of
scrutiny, a female body placed on display in a
predominantly masculine visual domain.
A second screen shows scenes from a late fifties
British exploitation film (Michael Powells Peeping
Tom, from which the exhibition derives its title), in
which a psychopathic film maker murders desirable young
girls before the camera, documenting the last traumatic
moments of their lives. As in Hitchcocks Psycho,
the relationship between voyeuristic pleasure and sexual
violence is made explicit through the use of a shifting
subjectivity: the audience is forced to adopt the
positions of both aggressor and victim.
The structure and theoretical context of
Drummonds peeping tom requires similar acts
of subjective transitivity. The third video screen
projects a real time picture of the exhibition,
relocating the spectators themselves as objects within
the installation. The observer is subsequently made to
recognise h/erself as other, as a being existing beyond
the more familiar parameters of the self. Like the
tinted beauties in Drummonds
enlargements, the viewer is divested of agency by the
presence of h/er own electronically reconstructed image.
In short, one must become other in order to understand
the process by which the gaze silences the woman,
reducing her to inarticulate object.
Perry Fowler
1996
|